auṁ āpyāyantu mamāṇgāni vākprāṇaścakśuḥ śrotram-athobalam-indriyāṇi ca sarvāṇi |
sarvaṁ brahmopniṣadam mā’ham brahma nirākuryām mā mā brahma nirākarod-anirākaraṇamstva-nirākaraṇam me’stu |
tadātmani nirate ya upaniṣatsu dharmāste mayi santu te mayi santu ||
auṁ śāntiḥ śāntiḥ śāntiḥ ||
Yesterday I was explaining the part – mā’ham brahma nirākuryām mā mā brahma nirākarod. Understand just because your Dad did not give you pocket money, you can’t say, “My Dad does not exist or you are no more my Dad,” which we all usually do in many relationships, please understand. When you look at a relationship utility based, if your utility is not addressed, you go to the extreme of not just denying the relationship, denying the very existence of the object or the other side, understand. If your father is not giving you pocket money, if it is for right reason, he is a good father. If it is for a wrong reason, he can be bad father, but you can’t say, he is NOT your father.
Denying the existence, that is the worst stupidity, stupid stand atheists have decided to take. I have seen many times people doing that, understand. This tendency of either be useful to me as I want or I will deny you to your very core, is the tendency of intense violence, which comes from intense violence.
You deny something for me, I deny something for you – is an equal fight, the mentality of the warrior, Kshatriya. If you deny something, I will find out ‘why’ and I will try to work with you, do some bargain and get it from you – is the mentality of Vaishya, businessman. Even if you deny, I will work with you, complete with you and make you be part of me – is the tendency of Brahmana, knowledge. If you deny something for me, I will deny your very existence, Chandāla. Not Kashi Chandāla. Kashi Chandāla, Sadāshiva Himself came as Chandāla to give darshan to Shankara, not Kashi Chandāla. In Kashi you can’t even think Chandāla as Chandāla.
In Kashi you should be always aware, anything can be Sadāshiva.
If some of your utility is denied or you imagine it is denied, you deny the very existence of the other person. I think this tendency is the life denial approach towards existence. I have seen people suffering with this pattern. Many time if they fail in the examination, they will deny the whole authenticity of the education. Of course I am not interested in authenticating the present education system. But, that clarity came to Me after analyzing not by failing any exam. I never failed any exam in My life – I want to put this on record. Not by failing in exam. Just because one bank transaction did not go through, you cannot deny the very existence of money. Fools do that. That is why the Upanishad clearly declares.
And I wanted to put it on record this one corrections. Wherever I say, when I talk about Upanishad, “Upanishadic Rishis say”, you should make it as “Upanishad says” because we don’t even know whether some Rishis existed and recorded this, even that is a belief. I feel they are self-effulgent, they JUST came to exist. They are Self-effulgent, svayam-prakasha. So let me not add the load of the “Upanishadic Rishi” word. Let me use straight word – Upanishad.
The Upanishad declares here – mā’ham brahma nirākuryām |
The people of the book can never understand – a book can exist without people. But the people of Dhamma, know the Dhamma exists even if there are no people to follow. Understand, people of the book can never understand – a book can come into existence without people. People of Dhamma know Dhamma exists even if when there are no people to follow. Just because you tried with one girlfriend or boyfriend and failed, you can’t deny the very existence of relationship. You can’t deny the very existence of education system, because you failed one examination. Understand, I am neither attesting relationship nor attesting examination. I am only saying – by failing in one, you can’t deny the whole, that’s all. If you come to an understanding and enlightened, and then come to a conclusion, that is different.
Exams are like girlfriends. One, too many questions. Second, difficult to understand. Third, more explanation is needed. Fourth, result is always failed.
I am not supporting or promoting, I am only insisting, reminding. Denial of Whole because some part was not useful for you is Chandālatva, stupidity in its peak, cunningness in its extremity. I have seen people gambling with God, they will tell – “Today you have to do this, otherwise you are not existing, I know.” No people do it. People do all this with Ganapati, Hanuman, Shirdi Sai Baba, even with Mahadeva, people try to play all this game. “You have to do this today, otherwise I know you don’t exist. If you exist, do it.”
Kalabhairava has a clear policy. If somebody comes with a life-positive approach, He showers them. If somebody comes with a seeking, He gives them Completion.
Never deny the existence of Brahman – mā’ham brahma nirākuryām
Do not have incompletion with existence of Consciousness – mā mā brahma nirākarod. May Brahman never deny me or withdraw Its grace from me.
Understand, by you not denying the existence of Consciousness, you also create a will – let the Brahman not deny me. Let Brahman not withdraw Its grace from me. Actually He never withdraws. Either you stop or you don’t stop, that’s all, He doesn’t withdraw. You stop His grace flowing on you or you don’t stop His grace flowing on you, that’s it.
mā’ham brahma nirākuryām mā mā brahma nirākarod-anirākaraṇamstva-nirākaraṇam me’stu | anirākaraṇamstva-nirākaraṇam me’stu |
Let there be no separation. Let me have complete Completion with Brahman, the Consciousness; and let Brahman be complete with me. So be it.
anirākaraṇamstva-nirākaraṇam me’stu |
anirākaraṇamstva-nirākaraṇam me’stu |